1963 Lotus Elite vs. 1983 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 1983 Plymouth Voyager is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 770 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elite | 1983 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | Lotus | Plymouth |
Model | Elite | Voyager |
Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2860 mm |