1963 Lotus Elite vs. 1989 Rover 216
To start off, 1989 Rover 216 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Rover 216 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover 216 (114 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover 216 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Rover 216 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover 216, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elite | 1989 Rover 216 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Elite | 216 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2550 mm |