1963 Lotus Elite vs. 1999 Peugeot 106
To start off, 1999 Peugeot 106 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,216 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lotus Elite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elite (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1999 Peugeot 106. (44 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elite should accelerate faster than 1999 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Peugeot 106 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Elite | 1999 Peugeot 106 | |
| Make | Lotus | Peugeot |
| Model | Elite | 106 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |
