1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2001 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2001 Honda CR-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda CR-V (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Honda CR-V weights approximately 920 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elite | 2001 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Lotus | Honda |
Model | Elite | CR-V |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2620 mm |