1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (149 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elite | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elite | 3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |