1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (242 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Elite | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Lotus | Toyota |
| Model | Elite | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |
