1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2005 Morgan Aeromax
To start off, 2005 Morgan Aeromax is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Morgan Aeromax is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Morgan Aeromax (329 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Morgan Aeromax should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Elite | 2005 Morgan Aeromax | |
| Make | Lotus | Morgan |
| Model | Elite | Aeromax |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 329 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |
