1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2007 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2007 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1322 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Elite | 2007 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Lotus | SsangYong |
| Model | Elite | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1902 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 80 L |
