1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elite | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Lotus | Citroen |
Model | Elite | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |