1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (350 HP @ 3013 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1957 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elite | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Lotus | Dodge |
Model | Elite | Ram |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 6690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3013 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 129 L |