1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,245 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Jazz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elite (83 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elite should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Jazz weights approximately 468 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elite | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Lotus | Honda |
Model | Elite | Jazz |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 77 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 42 L |