1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Elite | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Lotus | Chevrolet |
| Model | Elite | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2760 mm |
