1963 Lotus Elite vs. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1945 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Elite | 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
| Make | Lotus | Chevrolet |
| Model | Elite | Tahoe |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 316 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 2525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2007 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1953 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 98 L |
