1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Seven | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Seven | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 65 L |
