1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1976 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volkswagen Polo (39 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 270 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 1976 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Lotus | Volkswagen |
Model | Seven | Polo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 39 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2410 mm |