1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 890 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Lotus | Oldsmobile |
Model | Seven | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2680 mm |