1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 740 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 1984 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Lotus | Plymouth |
Model | Seven | Caravelle |
Year Released | 1963 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2630 mm |