1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1994 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mercedes-Benz E (120 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 866 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Seven | 1994 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Seven | E |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1440 mm |
