1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 1994 Rover 200 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 200 weights approximately 645 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Seven | 200 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2510 mm |