1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1995 Volvo 850
To start off, 1995 Volvo 850 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,982 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Volvo 850 (124 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Volvo 850 weights approximately 960 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 1995 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | Seven | 850 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2670 mm |