1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1997 Tata E
To start off, 1997 Tata E is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Tata E weights approximately 940 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Seven | 1997 Tata E | |
| Make | Lotus | Tata |
| Model | Seven | E |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2810 mm |
