1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1998 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1998 Maserati Shamal is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Maserati Shamal (322 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Maserati Shamal weights approximately 890 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 1998 Maserati Shamal | |
Make | Lotus | Maserati |
Model | Seven | Shamal |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 3217 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2520 mm |