1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 985 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Seven | SLK |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 3196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |