1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (213 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 1207 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Lotus | Subaru |
Model | Seven | Outback |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1637 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 64 L |