1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Seven | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Seven | Colt |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 95 L |
