1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2008 Seat Altea
To start off, 2008 Seat Altea is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Seat Altea is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Seat Altea weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Seat Altea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 2008 Seat Altea | |
Make | Lotus | Seat |
Model | Seven | Altea |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |