1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Seven | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Seven | 5 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |
