1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Lotus | Citroen |
Model | Seven | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |