1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1318 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Seven | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Lotus | Cadillac |
| Model | Seven | CTS |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 68 L |
