1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus Seven has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus Seven will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Lotus | Holden |
Model | Seven | Epica |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2700 mm |