1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Seven | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Lotus | Lotus |
| Model | Seven | Evora |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |
