1963 Marcos Ugly Duckling vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Marcos Ugly Duckling. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Marcos Ugly Duckling would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 1068 kg more than 1963 Marcos Ugly Duckling.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Marcos Ugly Duckling | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Marcos | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Ugly Duckling | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 414 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1840 mm |
