1963 Maserati 151 vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati 151 (425 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 2006 Volvo V50. (135 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo V50 weights approximately 624 kg more than 1963 Maserati 151.
Because 1963 Maserati 151 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Maserati 151. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Maserati 151 | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | 151 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1484 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2650 mm |
