1963 Maserati 151 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1963 Maserati 151. (425 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1963 Maserati 151. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1963 Maserati 151. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Maserati 151 | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Maserati | Cadillac |
| Model | 151 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2880 mm |
