1963 Maserati 5000 GT vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Maserati 5000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Maserati 5000 GT would be higher. At 4,939 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Maserati 5000 GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati 5000 GT (335 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati 5000 GT should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Because 1963 Maserati 5000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Maserati 5000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Maserati 5000 GT | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Maserati | Honda |
Model | 5000 GT | CR-V |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4939 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |