1963 Maserati Quattroporte vs. 1955 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 4,136 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1955 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Maserati Quattroporte weights approximately 860 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Maserati Quattroporte | 1955 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Maserati | Maserati |
| Model | Quattroporte | A6G |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4136 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2560 mm |
