1963 Mazda R 360 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (180 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 1406 kg more than 1963 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (274 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Mazda R 360 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | R 360 | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 3278 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 23 Nm | 274 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1786 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 5540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 73 L |
