1963 Mazda R 360 vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 6,206 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 491 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS (631 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 608 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Mazda R 360 | 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | R 360 | CLS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 6206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 507 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 23 Nm | 631 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 102.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 94.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |