1963 Mazda R 360 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 369 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 525 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Mazda R 360 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | R 360 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 23 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1966 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 132 L |
