1963 Mazda R 360 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 255 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 577 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Mazda R 360 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | R 360 | XF |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 23 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |
