1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 vs. 2000 Tata Estate
To start off, 2000 Tata Estate is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 (150 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2000 Tata Estate. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Estate. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata Estate weights approximately 345 kg more than 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 (216 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata Estate. (119 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata Estate.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 | 2000 Tata Estate | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Tata |
Model | 230 | Estate |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |