1963 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 300 (271 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1963 Mercedes-Benz 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1963 Mercedes-Benz 300 has manual transmission. 1963 Mercedes-Benz 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Smart |
Model | 300 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1867 mm |