1963 Mercury Monterey vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 701 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Because 1963 Mercury Monterey is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Mercury Monterey. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Mercury Monterey | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mercury | Rover |
Model | Monterey | 200 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1776 kg | 1075 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2510 mm |