1963 Mercury Monterey vs. 2010 Volvo S60
To start off, 2010 Volvo S60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 7 kg more than 2010 Volvo S60.
Because 2010 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Mercury Monterey. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Mercury Monterey | 2010 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Mercury | Volvo |
| Model | Monterey | S60 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1776 kg | 1769 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2776 mm |
