1963 MG 1100 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1969 Riley Kestrel is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 85 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Riley Kestrel (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1969 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 MG 1100 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | MG | Riley |
| Model | 1100 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2380 mm |
