1963 MG 1100 vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Opel Ascona (115 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Ascona weights approximately 240 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Opel Ascona (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Opel Ascona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 MG 1100 | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | MG | Opel |
| Model | 1100 | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 154 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2740 mm |
