1963 MG 1100 vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Suzuki C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Suzuki C2 weights approximately 23 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 MG 1100 | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | MG | Suzuki |
| Model | 1100 | C2 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 848 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2240 mm |
