1963 MG 1100 vs. 2002 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2002 Westfield ZEI is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Westfield ZEI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Westfield ZEI (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 MG 1100 weights approximately 153 kg more than 2002 Westfield ZEI.
Because 2002 Westfield ZEI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Westfield ZEI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 MG 1100 | 2002 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | MG | Westfield |
Model | 1100 | ZEI |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 672 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2340 mm |