1963 MG 1100 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 MG 1100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1963 MG 1100 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |