1963 MG 1100 vs. 2008 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Toyota Camry is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,311 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Camry (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Camry weights approximately 527 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Camry (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1963 MG 1100 | 2008 Toyota Camry | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Camry |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3311 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1352 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2730 mm |